The final score says 27-23, but the story of this NFC matchup lives in the numbers underneath it. A backup quarterback nearly out-dueled a franchise starter. A pass rusher who had been quiet for weeks suddenly looked unblockable. And a road team that spent most of the afternoon trailing found a way to win in the final minutes.
If you’re trying to make sense of the Green Bay Packers vs Arizona Cardinals match player stats, you’re in the right place. This breakdown goes beyond the box score. You’ll see who actually moved the chains, which defensive plays flipped the game, and what the numbers mean for both teams going forward.
Quick Overview
- Final Score: Packers 27, Cardinals 23
- Date: October 19, 2025 (Week 7)
- Location: State Farm Stadium, Glendale, Arizona
- Packers QB: Jordan Love — 19/29, 179 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT
- Cardinals QB: Jacoby Brissett — 25/36, 279 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT
- Defensive Standout: Micah Parsons — 3 sacks, 5 QB hits, 10 pressures
- Turnovers: Packers 0, Cardinals 1 (lost fumble)
What Was the Final Score and How Did the Game Unfold?
The Packers won 27-23, but they didn’t lead until the fourth quarter. Arizona started fast with a field goal and kept Green Bay’s offense out of the end zone for most of the first half. The Cardinals held a 13-6 lead at halftime and stretched it to 23-20 late in the fourth quarter.
The turning point came with about six minutes left. Arizona faced a fourth-and-1 near midfield, and Jacoby Brissett’s QB sneak was stopped short. Green Bay took over and drove 48 yards in 10 plays, capped by Josh Jacobs’ 1-yard touchdown run.
Arizona had one last chance. Brissett moved the Cardinals inside the Green Bay 30, but Micah Parsons’ third sack of the game pushed them into a long-yardage situation. The final fourth-down heave fell incomplete.
How Did the Quarterbacks Perform?
This game was a tale of two very different passing lines.
Jordan Love didn’t need to be spectacular. He completed 65.5% of his passes for 179 yards and one touchdown, posting a 93.9 passer rating. He also added 22 rushing yards on four carries and avoided turnovers. Love’s longest completion went for 22 yards to Romeo Doubs, and he spread the ball to seven different receivers.
Jacoby Brissett, starting in place of the injured Kyler Murray, was the more productive passer. He completed 69.4% of his throws for 279 yards and two touchdowns, finishing with a 110.8 rating. He also led the Cardinals with 26 rushing yards. But he was sacked six times and lost a fumble, and that pressure ultimately made the difference.
Quarterback Comparison
| Stat | Jordan Love (GB) | Jacoby Brissett (ARI) |
|---|---|---|
| Completions / Attempts | 19 / 29 | 25 / 36 |
| Completion % | 65.5% | 69.4% |
| Passing Yards | 179 | 279 |
| Passing TDs | 1 | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
| Sacks Taken | 1 | 6 |
| Passer Rating | 93.9 | 110.8 |
| Rushing Yards | 22 | 26 |
Love managed the game. Brissett nearly won it. The difference was the six sacks Arizona allowed and the one drive Green Bay’s defense came up with when it mattered.
Which Running Backs and Receivers Made an Impact?
Josh Jacobs was the engine of Green Bay’s scoring. He carried 13 times for 55 yards and two touchdowns, including the game-winner. He didn’t break off any long runs — his longest was 10 yards — but he converted the short-yardage situations that kept drives alive.
Through the air, Romeo Doubs led the Packers with six catches for 72 yards on eight targets. Tucker Kraft added five receptions for 58 yards and a touchdown, while rookie Matthew Golden chipped in four catches for 37 yards.
For Arizona, Trey McBride was the focal point. He caught 10 of 13 targets for 74 yards and two touchdowns, consistently finding soft spots in Green Bay’s coverage. Zay Jones made the most of his two catches, turning them into 67 yards, and Marvin Harrison Jr. added two grabs for 58 yards.
The Cardinals’ running game was less effective. Bam Knight carried 14 times for 57 yards, and Brissett was the second-leading rusher with 26 yards. As a team, Arizona averaged just 3.4 yards per carry.
Key Skill-Position Stats at a Glance
- Josh Jacobs (GB): 13 carries, 55 yards, 2 TDs; 1 catch, 3 yards
- Romeo Doubs (GB): 6 catches, 72 yards
- Tucker Kraft (GB): 5 catches, 58 yards, 1 TD
- Trey McBride (ARI): 10 catches, 74 yards, 2 TDs
- Bam Knight (ARI): 14 carries, 57 yards; 3 catches, 7 yards
How Did the Defenses Shape the Outcome?
The box score says Micah Parsons had three sacks, but the numbers go deeper. According to NFL.com, Parsons generated 10 quarterback pressures on 32 rushes and was doubled on 11 snaps. He entered the week with just 2.5 sacks on the season. Against Arizona, he looked like the Defensive Player of the Year candidate Green Bay traded for.
The official NFL recap of Parsons’ three-sack performance notes that he tied a career high with five QB hits and consistently beat Arizona’s tackles one-on-one. His final sack came on the Cardinals’ last meaningful possession, forcing a fourth-and-long that ended the game.
Green Bay’s run defense was equally stingy. Arizona managed 94 rushing yards on 28 attempts — a 3.4-yard average — and no rushing touchdowns. Quay Walker led the Packers with nine tackles, including 1.5 sacks, and Edgerrin Cooper added five tackles and a pass defensed.
Arizona’s defense had its moments. The Cardinals sacked Love only once, but they held Green Bay to 262 total yards and 3-of-10 on third down. Linebacker Blake Baker and Akeem Davis-Gaither each recorded eight tackles. In the end, though, they couldn’t get off the field on Green Bay’s go-ahead drive.
What Do the Team Stats Reveal About the Matchup?
The raw team numbers tell a story of two offenses that moved the ball differently.
Green Bay ran 53 plays for 262 yards — a 4.9-yard average. Arizona ran 70 plays for 330 yards — a 4.7-yard average. The Cardinals controlled the ball for 34:10, compared to 25:50 for the Packers. They converted 7 of 14 third downs, while Green Bay converted just 3 of 10.
So how did the Packers win with fewer yards and less possession? Turnovers and red-zone efficiency.
Green Bay turned the ball over zero times. Arizona lost one fumble. The Packers scored touchdowns on 3 of 4 red-zone trips. The Cardinals scored touchdowns on 2 of 4. In a four-point game, those margins matter more than total yards.
Team Stats Comparison
| Stat | Packers | Cardinals |
|---|---|---|
| Total Yards | 262 | 330 |
| Plays | 53 | 70 |
| Yards per Play | 4.9 | 4.7 |
| Third-Down Efficiency | 3/10 | 7/14 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 1 |
| Red-Zone TDs | 3/4 | 2/4 |
| Time of Possession | 25:50 | 34:10 |
| Sacks Allowed | 1 | 6 |
How Does This Game Fit Into the Historical Series?
Green Bay’s win improved its all-time record against the Cardinals franchise to 50-26-4, including a 24-19-4 mark in regular-season road games. The two teams have met 80 times since 1921, making this one of the older cross-conference rivalries in the NFL.
The Packers have now won two straight against Arizona, including a 34-13 victory in 2024. But the 2025 meeting was far more competitive, and it exposed some of the same issues that have followed both teams: Arizona’s inability to protect the quarterback, and Green Bay’s tendency to play down to its competition.
You can explore the full Packers vs Cardinals all-time matchup history on Pro-Football-Reference to see how this result stacks up against decades of head-to-head data.
What Are the Key Takeaways for Fantasy Football?
If you play fantasy football, this game offered a few useful signals.
Trey McBride is quarterback-proof. Even with a backup under center, McBride saw 13 targets and turned them into 10 catches, 74 yards, and two scores. He’s a weekly TE1 regardless of who’s throwing the ball.
Josh Jacobs remains a touchdown machine. He didn’t rack up yards — 55 on 13 carries — but he scored twice and handled the goal-line work. That’s his fantasy value in a nutshell.
Jacoby Brissett can support pass-catchers. In two starts since Murray’s injury, Brissett has shown enough arm talent to keep McBride and Harrison Jr. relevant. He’s not a QB1, but he’s not a downgrade for the skill players around him.
Micah Parsons is back. After a slow start to the season, his three-sack game is a reminder that he can single-handedly swing a matchup. If he’s available in your IDP league, pounce.
FAQ
What were Jordan Love’s stats against the Cardinals in 2025?
Love completed 19 of 29 passes for 179 yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions. He added 22 rushing yards and finished with a 93.9 passer rating.
How many sacks did Micah Parsons have against Arizona?
Parsons recorded three sacks, five QB hits, and 10 pressures. It was his first three-sack game as a member of the Packers.
Did the Packers cover the spread against the Cardinals?
The Packers won by four points. The closing spread was Green Bay -7, so they did not cover.
Who led the Cardinals in receiving yards?
Trey McBride led Arizona with 10 catches for 74 yards and two touchdowns. Zay Jones added 67 yards on two catches.
What was the turnover differential in the Packers-Cardinals game?
Green Bay turned the ball over zero times. Arizona lost one fumble. The Packers scored 7 points off that turnover.
How did the Packers’ run defense perform against Arizona?
Green Bay held Arizona to 94 rushing yards on 28 attempts — a 3.4-yard average — and did not allow a rushing touchdown.
Conclusion
The Green Bay Packers vs Arizona Cardinals match player stats paint a picture of a game that was closer than the final score suggests — and more revealing than a simple win-loss column. Jordan Love didn’t need to carry the offense. Jacoby Brissett played well enough to win. The difference was a handful of plays: a fourth-down stop, a three-sack eruption from Micah Parsons, and a rookie quarterback who avoided the big mistake.
Green Bay escaped with a win it needed. Arizona left with another loss it could almost taste. And for anyone digging into the numbers, the box score offers a lesson that shows up every week in the NFL: yards don’t win games. Turnovers, red-zone execution, and one dominant pass rusher can flip the result.
You Also Like To Read: Denver Nuggets vs Utah Jazz Match Player Stats: A Complete Breakdown